Demographics details for Newton, MA vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newton, MA vs South jordan, UT.
| Data | Newton | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 87,381 | 83,513 |
| Median Age | 41.7 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $176,373 | $119,822 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Newton vs South jordan
- In Newton, the population is higher at 87,381, compared to 83,513 in South jordan.
- Residents in Newton have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- Newton has a higher median income of $176,373 compared to $119,822 in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Newton at 47.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
- The poverty level is identical in both Newton and South jordan at 5%.
- South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Newton.
Demographics
Demographics Newton vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newton | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 83 |
| Asian | 14 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Newton vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Newton at 3% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 73% in Newton.
- The Asian population is larger in Newton at 14% compared to 4% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Newton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Newton at 6% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Newton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newton | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.9% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 21.7% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newton vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.4% in Newton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 19.7% in Newton.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Newton and South jordan at 7.3%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newton at 19.1% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- South jordan has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 21.7% in Newton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Newton at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newton | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (413) | 0.2% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 4.5% (3,941) | 8.4% (6,995) |
| Less than High School | 2.9% (2,554) | 2.7% (2,236) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.7% (47,769) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newton vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.4% compared to 4.5% in Newton.
- More residents in Newton have less than a high school education at 2.9% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Newton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.7% compared to 27.1% in South jordan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.