Demographics details for Newton upper falls, MA vs Trumann, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Newton upper falls, MA vs Trumann, AR.

Data Newton upper falls Trumann
Population 10,000 7,305
Median Age 42.0 years 40.0 years
Median Income $120,000 $37,618
Married Families 60.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 6% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Newton upper falls vs Trumann

  • In Newton upper falls, the population is higher at 10,000, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
  • Residents in Newton upper falls have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 40.0 years in Trumann.
  • Newton upper falls has a higher median income of $120,000 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Newton upper falls at 60.0% compared to 35.0% in Trumann.
  • The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 6% in Newton upper falls.
  • Trumann has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Newton upper falls.

Demographics

Demographics Newton upper falls vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Newton upper falls Trumann
Black 5 5
White 85 84
Asian 8 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Newton upper falls vs Trumann

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Newton upper falls and Trumann at 5%.
  • Newton upper falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 84% in Trumann.
  • The Asian population is larger in Newton upper falls at 8% compared to 0% in Trumann.
  • Trumann has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Newton upper falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trumann at 8%, compared to 0% in Newton upper falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newton upper falls and Trumann at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Newton upper falls Trumann
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.2%
Depression Data is updating% 28.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 25.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 44.6%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Newton upper falls vs Trumann

  • In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Newton upper falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 0.0% in Newton upper falls.
  • Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Newton upper falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Trumann at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Newton upper falls.
  • Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 0.0% in Newton upper falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in Newton upper falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Newton upper falls Trumann
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.8% (135)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 25.9% (1,895)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 24.4% (1,780)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.7% (487)

Education Levels Comparison: Newton upper falls vs Trumann

  • In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Newton upper falls.
  • In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 0.0% in Newton upper falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 0.0% in Newton upper falls.
  • In Trumann, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.7% compared to 0.0% in Newton upper falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.