Demographics details for Newark, OH vs Sikeston, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Newark, OH vs Sikeston, MO.
| Data | Newark | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 50,763 | 16,073 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $56,284 | $47,464 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Newark vs Sikeston
- In Newark, the population is higher at 50,763, compared to 16,073 in Sikeston.
- Residents in Newark have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 37.3 years in Sikeston.
- Newark has a higher median income of $56,284 compared to $47,464 in Sikeston.
- In Sikeston, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Newark.
- The poverty level is higher in Sikeston at 16%, compared to 12% in Newark.
- The unemployment rate in Newark is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.4% in Sikeston.
Demographics
Demographics Newark vs Sikeston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Newark | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 25 |
| White | 88 | 65 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Newark vs Sikeston
- In Sikeston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 3% in Newark.
- Newark has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 65% in Sikeston.
- The Asian population is larger in Newark at 1% compared to 0% in Sikeston.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Newark and Sikeston at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sikeston at 7%, compared to 5% in Newark.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Newark and Sikeston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Newark | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 23.2% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 39.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Newark vs Sikeston
- In Sikeston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.4% in Newark.
- Depression is more prevalent in Newark at 26.0% compared to 24.6% in Sikeston.
- Sikeston has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 23.2% in Newark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Newark at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Sikeston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Newark at 41.9% compared to 39.0% in Sikeston.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Newark and Sikeston at 20.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Newark | Sikeston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (258) | 0.5% (76) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (10,967) | 23.0% (3,696) |
| Less than High School | 10.6% (5,370) | 13.3% (2,142) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.0% (7,627) | 16.3% (2,619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Newark vs Sikeston
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Newark and Sikeston at 0.5%.
- In Sikeston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 21.6% in Newark.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sikeston at 13.3%, compared to 10.6% in Newark.
- In Sikeston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 15.0% in Newark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.