Demographics details for New riegel, OH vs Caruthersville, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in New riegel, OH vs Caruthersville, MO.

Data New riegel Caruthersville
Population 282 5,295
Median Age 32.3 years 36.8 years
Median Income $57,500 $35,585
Married Families 46.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 6% 20%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 5.6

Population Comparison: New riegel vs Caruthersville

  • The population in Caruthersville is higher at 5,295, compared to 282 in New riegel.
  • The median age in Caruthersville is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 32.3 years in New riegel.
  • New riegel has a higher median income of $57,500 compared to $35,585 in Caruthersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in New riegel at 46.0% compared to 26.0% in Caruthersville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Caruthersville at 20%, compared to 6% in New riegel.
  • Caruthersville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 2.5% in New riegel.

Demographics

Demographics New riegel vs Caruthersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic New riegel Caruthersville
Black Data is updating 40
White 69 52
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 21 5
Two or More Races 10 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: New riegel vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 0% in New riegel.
  • New riegel has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 52% in Caruthersville.
  • Both New riegel and Caruthersville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in New riegel at 21% compared to 5% in Caruthersville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in New riegel at 10% compared to 3% in Caruthersville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both New riegel and Caruthersville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric New riegel Caruthersville
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 17.0%
Depression 22.8% 25.6%
Smoking 19.3% 28.4%
Binge Drinking 19.4% 14.6%
Obesity 39.6% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: New riegel vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.3% in New riegel.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Caruthersville at 25.6% versus 22.8% in New riegel.
  • Caruthersville has a higher smoking rate at 28.4% compared to 19.3% in New riegel.
  • Binge drinking is more common in New riegel at 19.4% compared to 14.6% in Caruthersville.
  • Caruthersville has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 39.6% in New riegel.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Caruthersville at 27.0% compared to 18.0% in New riegel.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level New riegel Caruthersville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (42)
High School Diploma 27.7% (78) 23.6% (1,249)
Less than High School 12.8% (36) 23.0% (1,217)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (32) 9.1% (484)

Education Levels Comparison: New riegel vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in New riegel.
  • A higher percentage of residents in New riegel hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 23.6% in Caruthersville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Caruthersville at 23.0%, compared to 12.8% in New riegel.
  • A higher percentage of residents in New riegel hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 9.1% in Caruthersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.