Demographics details for New richmond, IN vs Powder springs, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in New richmond, IN vs Powder springs, GA.

Data New richmond Powder springs
Population 313 17,337
Median Age 37.5 years 38.7 years
Median Income $75,750 $88,311
Married Families 50.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: New richmond vs Powder springs

  • The population in Powder springs is higher at 17,337, compared to 313 in New richmond.
  • The median age in Powder springs is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 37.5 years in New richmond.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311, compared to $75,750 in New richmond.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in New richmond at 50.0% compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Powder springs at 12%, compared to 6% in New richmond.
  • Powder springs has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in New richmond.

Demographics

Demographics New richmond vs Powder springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic New richmond Powder springs
Black 2 51
White 93 22
Asian 3 2
Hispanic 1 19
Two or More Races 1 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: New richmond vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 2% in New richmond.
  • New richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in New richmond at 3% compared to 2% in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 1% in New richmond.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Powder springs at 5%, compared to 1% in New richmond.
  • In Powder springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in New richmond.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric New richmond Powder springs
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 10.7%
Depression 26.7% 17.7%
Smoking 20.9% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 17.4% 14.4%
Obesity 35.5% 33.0%
Disability Percentage 36.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: New richmond vs Powder springs

  • More residents in New richmond report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in New richmond at 26.7% compared to 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in New richmond at 20.9% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in New richmond at 17.4% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in New richmond at 35.5% compared to 33.0% in Powder springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in New richmond at 36.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level New richmond Powder springs
No Schooling 0.6% (2) 1.3% (225)
High School Diploma 34.5% (108) 15.0% (2,598)
Less than High School 31.3% (98) 7.6% (1,309)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.9% (31) 26.3% (4,561)

Education Levels Comparison: New richmond vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in New richmond.
  • A higher percentage of residents in New richmond hold a high school diploma at 34.5% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • More residents in New richmond have less than a high school education at 31.3% compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • In Powder springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 9.9% in New richmond.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.