Demographics details for Nettleton, MS vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Nettleton, MS vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Nettleton | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,893 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 41.3 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $41,317 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Nettleton vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 1,893 in Nettleton.
- Residents in Nettleton have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $41,317 in Nettleton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Nettleton at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is identical in both Nettleton and Coalinga at 15%.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.2% in Nettleton.
Demographics
Demographics Nettleton vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Nettleton | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 4 |
| White | 72 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Nettleton vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Nettleton at 23% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Nettleton has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Nettleton.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 5% in Nettleton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 0% in Nettleton.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Nettleton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Nettleton | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Nettleton vs Coalinga
- More residents in Nettleton report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Nettleton at 23.3% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Nettleton at 22.9% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 14.0% in Nettleton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Nettleton at 39.4% compared to 39.1% in Coalinga.
- Disability percentages are higher in Nettleton at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Nettleton | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (8) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (472) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (288) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.3% (120) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Nettleton vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.4% in Nettleton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Nettleton hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 15.2% in Nettleton.
- In Coalinga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.1% compared to 6.3% in Nettleton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.