Demographics details for Netawaka, KS vs Livingston, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Netawaka, KS vs Livingston, AL.
Data | Netawaka | Livingston |
---|---|---|
Population | 139 | 3,205 |
Median Age | 44.7 years | 21.2 years |
Median Income | $70,417 | $20,417 |
Married Families | 65.0% | 19.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 27% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Netawaka vs Livingston
- The population in Livingston is higher at 3,205, compared to 139 in Netawaka.
- Residents in Netawaka have a higher median age of 44.7 years compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
- Netawaka has a higher median income of $70,417 compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Netawaka at 65.0% compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
- The poverty level is higher in Livingston at 27%, compared to 11% in Netawaka.
- Livingston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Netawaka.
Demographics
Demographics Netawaka vs Livingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Netawaka | Livingston |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 58 |
White | 89 | 38 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Netawaka vs Livingston
- In Livingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 0% in Netawaka.
- Netawaka has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- Both Netawaka and Livingston have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Netawaka and Livingston at 1%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Netawaka at 6% compared to 2% in Livingston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Netawaka at 3% compared to 0% in Livingston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Netawaka | Livingston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 20.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 14.7% |
Depression | 22.6% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 17.6% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 12.3% |
Obesity | 39.0% | 46.2% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Netawaka vs Livingston
- In Livingston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 15.7% in Netawaka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Netawaka at 22.6% compared to 22.0% in Livingston.
- Livingston has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 17.6% in Netawaka.
- Binge drinking is more common in Netawaka at 19.4% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
- Livingston has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 39.0% in Netawaka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Netawaka at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Livingston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Netawaka | Livingston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (31) | 7.7% (248) |
Less than High School | 3.6% (5) | 2.3% (74) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (15) | 15.5% (496) |
Education Levels Comparison: Netawaka vs Livingston
- A higher percentage of residents in Netawaka have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Netawaka hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 7.7% in Livingston.
- More residents in Netawaka have less than a high school education at 3.6% compared to 2.3% in Livingston.
- In Livingston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 10.8% in Netawaka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.