Demographics details for Nescopeck, PA vs Sterling, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Nescopeck, PA vs Sterling, IL.
| Data | Nescopeck | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,479 | 14,566 |
| Median Age | 42.9 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,779 | $49,007 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Nescopeck vs Sterling
- The population in Sterling is higher at 14,566, compared to 1,479 in Nescopeck.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 42.9 years in Nescopeck.
- Nescopeck has a higher median income of $59,779 compared to $49,007 in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Nescopeck at 41.0% compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 9% in Nescopeck.
- The unemployment rate in Nescopeck is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Nescopeck vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Nescopeck | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 90 | 56 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Nescopeck vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Nescopeck at 3% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- Nescopeck has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 56% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Nescopeck.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 5% in Nescopeck.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 2% in Nescopeck.
- In Sterling, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Nescopeck.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Nescopeck | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Nescopeck vs Sterling
- More residents in Nescopeck report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Nescopeck at 22.6% compared to 22.2% in Sterling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Nescopeck at 20.1% compared to 18.6% in Sterling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Nescopeck at 18.7% compared to 17.4% in Sterling.
- Sterling has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 35.2% in Nescopeck.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Nescopeck.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Nescopeck | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 1.1% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 32.0% (474) | 24.1% (3,511) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (87) | 13.8% (2,012) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (189) | 11.8% (1,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Nescopeck vs Sterling
- In Sterling, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Nescopeck.
- A higher percentage of residents in Nescopeck hold a high school diploma at 32.0% compared to 24.1% in Sterling.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling at 13.8%, compared to 5.9% in Nescopeck.
- A higher percentage of residents in Nescopeck hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.