Demographics details for Nehawka, NE vs Portsmouth, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Nehawka, NE vs Portsmouth, NH.
| Data | Nehawka | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 172 | 22,713 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 42.1 years |
| Median Income | $86,250 | $100,169 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.1 |
Population Comparison: Nehawka vs Portsmouth
- The population in Portsmouth is higher at 22,713, compared to 172 in Nehawka.
- The median age in Portsmouth is higher at 42.1 years, compared to 37.5 years in Nehawka.
- Portsmouth has a higher median income of $100,169, compared to $86,250 in Nehawka.
- In Portsmouth, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Nehawka.
- Nehawka has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Portsmouth.
- The unemployment rate in Nehawka is higher at 2.5%, compared to 2.1% in Portsmouth.
Demographics
Demographics Nehawka vs Portsmouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Nehawka | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 97 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Nehawka vs Portsmouth
- In Portsmouth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Nehawka.
- Nehawka has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 89% in Portsmouth.
- In Portsmouth, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Nehawka.
- Portsmouth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Nehawka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Portsmouth at 4%, compared to 1% in Nehawka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Nehawka and Portsmouth at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Nehawka | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 18.4% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.1% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 27.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Nehawka vs Portsmouth
- In Portsmouth, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.0% compared to 12.8% in Nehawka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Portsmouth at 22.8% versus 18.4% in Nehawka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Nehawka at 13.1% compared to 11.5% in Portsmouth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Nehawka at 22.1% compared to 18.5% in Portsmouth.
- Obesity rates are higher in Nehawka at 37.6% compared to 27.6% in Portsmouth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Portsmouth at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Nehawka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Nehawka | Portsmouth |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (2) | 0.3% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (39) | 10.8% (2,450) |
| Less than High School | 14.0% (24) | 4.0% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (17) | 47.4% (10,777) |
Education Levels Comparison: Nehawka vs Portsmouth
- A higher percentage of residents in Nehawka have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Portsmouth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Nehawka hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 10.8% in Portsmouth.
- More residents in Nehawka have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 4.0% in Portsmouth.
- In Portsmouth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.4% compared to 9.9% in Nehawka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.