Demographics details for Navasota, TX vs Greensburg, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Navasota, TX vs Greensburg, PA.
| Data | Navasota | Greensburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,417 | 14,715 |
| Median Age | 33.0 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $47,793 | $58,001 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Navasota vs Greensburg
- The population in Greensburg is higher at 14,715, compared to 8,417 in Navasota.
- The median age in Greensburg is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 33.0 years in Navasota.
- Greensburg has a higher median income of $58,001, compared to $47,793 in Navasota.
- In Greensburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 30.0% in Navasota.
- Navasota has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Greensburg.
- The unemployment rate in Navasota is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Greensburg.
Demographics
Demographics Navasota vs Greensburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Navasota | Greensburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 3 |
| White | 16 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 43 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Navasota vs Greensburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Navasota at 20% compared to 3% in Greensburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Greensburg at 91% compared to 16% in Navasota.
- In Greensburg, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Navasota.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Navasota at 43% compared to 1% in Greensburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Navasota at 21% compared to 4% in Greensburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Navasota and Greensburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Navasota | Greensburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 44.5% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Navasota vs Greensburg
- More residents in Navasota report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.9% in Greensburg.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 22.9%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Navasota at 20.2% compared to 18.4% in Greensburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Greensburg at 18.3% compared to 15.5% in Navasota.
- Obesity rates are higher in Navasota at 44.5% compared to 34.2% in Greensburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greensburg at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Navasota.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Navasota | Greensburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (91) | 0.1% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 11.0% (924) | 17.0% (2,502) |
| Less than High School | 27.3% (2,301) | 5.1% (745) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (694) | 26.9% (3,965) |
Education Levels Comparison: Navasota vs Greensburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Navasota have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.1% in Greensburg.
- In Greensburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Navasota.
- More residents in Navasota have less than a high school education at 27.3% compared to 5.1% in Greensburg.
- In Greensburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.9% compared to 8.2% in Navasota.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.