Demographics details for Mullica hill, NJ vs Jackson, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mullica hill, NJ vs Jackson, MO.
| Data | Mullica hill | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,454 | 15,702 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $123,265 | $72,500 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mullica hill vs Jackson
- The population in Jackson is higher at 15,702, compared to 4,454 in Mullica hill.
- Residents in Mullica hill have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265 compared to $72,500 in Jackson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mullica hill at 46.0% compared to 44.0% in Jackson.
- The poverty level is higher in Jackson at 8%, compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
- Jackson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.
Demographics
Demographics Mullica hill vs Jackson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mullica hill | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 2 |
| White | 74 | 89 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Jackson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mullica hill at 11% compared to 2% in Jackson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jackson at 89% compared to 74% in Mullica hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Mullica hill at 4% compared to 1% in Jackson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mullica hill at 4% compared to 3% in Jackson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mullica hill at 7% compared to 5% in Jackson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mullica hill and Jackson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mullica hill | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 10.3% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 27.7% | 36.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mullica hill vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jackson at 25.5% versus 20.9% in Mullica hill.
- Jackson has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 10.3% in Mullica hill.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 19.1% in Jackson.
- Jackson has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 27.7% in Mullica hill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jackson at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Mullica hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mullica hill | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (33) | 0.5% (72) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (576) | 15.4% (2,423) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (244) | 7.8% (1,231) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.2% (1,612) | 23.8% (3,742) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mullica hill vs Jackson
- A higher percentage of residents in Mullica hill have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Jackson.
- In Jackson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 12.9% in Mullica hill.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jackson at 7.8%, compared to 5.5% in Mullica hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mullica hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 23.8% in Jackson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.