Demographics details for Mulberry, FL vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mulberry, FL vs Cochran, GA.
| Data | Mulberry | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,099 | 4,647 |
| Median Age | 48.7 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $50,645 | $31,326 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Mulberry vs Cochran
- The population in Cochran is higher at 4,647, compared to 4,099 in Mulberry.
- Residents in Mulberry have a higher median age of 48.7 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Mulberry has a higher median income of $50,645 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mulberry at 45.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 14% in Mulberry.
- The unemployment rate in Mulberry is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Mulberry vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mulberry | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 53 |
| White | 65 | 40 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mulberry vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 15% in Mulberry.
- Mulberry has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- Both Mulberry and Cochran have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mulberry at 14% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mulberry at 4% compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mulberry and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mulberry | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 19.4% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 33.2% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mulberry vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Mulberry.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cochran at 21.8% versus 19.4% in Mulberry.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 17.4% in Mulberry.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mulberry at 16.5% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 33.2% in Mulberry.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mulberry at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Cochran.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mulberry | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (57) | 1.2% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (1,019) | 12.2% (569) |
| Less than High School | 13.2% (541) | 15.1% (703) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (596) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mulberry vs Cochran
- A higher percentage of residents in Mulberry have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mulberry hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 13.2% in Mulberry.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mulberry hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.