Demographics details for Mount juliet, TN vs Fort lupton, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mount juliet, TN vs Fort lupton, CO.

Data Mount juliet Fort lupton
Population 42,548 8,829
Median Age 39.2 years 35.9 years
Median Income $108,066 $71,293
Married Families 45.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Mount juliet vs Fort lupton

  • In Mount juliet, the population is higher at 42,548, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
  • Residents in Mount juliet have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
  • Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066 compared to $71,293 in Fort lupton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mount juliet at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort lupton at 10%, compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
  • Fort lupton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.

Demographics

Demographics Mount juliet vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mount juliet Fort lupton
Black 7 Data is updating
White 79 26
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 6 53
Two or More Races 4 20
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Fort lupton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mount juliet at 7% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
  • Mount juliet has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mount juliet at 4% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
  • Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 6% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 4% in Mount juliet.
  • In Fort lupton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mount juliet.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mount juliet Fort lupton
Mental Health Not Good 16.0% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.0% 11.8%
Depression 25.7% 19.9%
Smoking 15.2% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 17.0%
Obesity 29.9% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mount juliet vs Fort lupton

  • More residents in Mount juliet report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 25.7% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mount juliet at 15.2% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 16.8% in Mount juliet.
  • Fort lupton has higher obesity rates at 30.2% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort lupton at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mount juliet Fort lupton
No Schooling 0.4% (173) 1.6% (145)
High School Diploma 10.4% (4,408) 16.2% (1,428)
Less than High School 3.9% (1,653) 28.0% (2,476)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.4% (12,510) 7.0% (622)

Education Levels Comparison: Mount juliet vs Fort lupton

  • In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Mount juliet.
  • In Fort lupton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mount juliet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.