Demographics details for Monroe city, IN vs Junction city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Monroe city, IN vs Junction city, KS.

Data Monroe city Junction city
Population 493 22,264
Median Age 33.8 years 28.5 years
Median Income $54,375 $60,709
Married Families 71.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 12% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.8

Population Comparison: Monroe city vs Junction city

  • The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 493 in Monroe city.
  • Residents in Monroe city have a higher median age of 33.8 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher median income of $60,709, compared to $54,375 in Monroe city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Monroe city at 71.0% compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 12% in Monroe city.
  • Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Monroe city.

Demographics

Demographics Monroe city vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Monroe city Junction city
Black Data is updating 20
White 98 43
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic Data is updating 18
Two or More Races 2 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Monroe city vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Monroe city.
  • Monroe city has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 43% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Monroe city.
  • Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Monroe city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 2% in Monroe city.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Monroe city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Monroe city Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.2% 11.0%
Depression 25.8% 19.2%
Smoking 19.4% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 17.4% 16.6%
Obesity 37.9% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Monroe city vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Monroe city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Monroe city at 25.8% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Monroe city at 19.4% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Monroe city at 17.4% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 37.9% in Monroe city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Monroe city at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Junction city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Monroe city Junction city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (216)
High School Diploma 55.2% (272) 12.4% (2,755)
Less than High School 13.4% (66) 6.9% (1,535)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.1% (40) 13.2% (2,941)

Education Levels Comparison: Monroe city vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Monroe city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Monroe city hold a high school diploma at 55.2% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
  • More residents in Monroe city have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 8.1% in Monroe city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.