Demographics details for Mirror lake, NH vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mirror lake, NH vs Tacoma, WA.
Data | Mirror lake | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Population | 130 | 221,776 |
Median Age | 55.0 years | 36.9 years |
Median Income | $80,000 | $79,085 |
Married Families | 60.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Mirror lake vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 130 in Mirror lake.
- Residents in Mirror lake have a higher median age of 55.0 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Mirror lake has a higher median income of $80,000 compared to $79,085 in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mirror lake at 60.0% compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- The poverty level is higher in Tacoma at 11%, compared to 5% in Mirror lake.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Mirror lake.
Demographics
Demographics Mirror lake vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mirror lake | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 11 |
White | 95 | 53 |
Asian | 2 | 9 |
Hispanic | 1 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Mirror lake vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Mirror lake.
- Mirror lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Mirror lake.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 1% in Mirror lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 2% in Mirror lake.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Mirror lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mirror lake | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.9% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 26.2% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.2% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mirror lake vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Mirror lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 0.0% in Mirror lake.
- Tacoma has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Mirror lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Mirror lake.
- Tacoma has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 0.0% in Mirror lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Mirror lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mirror lake | Tacoma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (3,474) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 14.2% (31,504) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.1% (22,501) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mirror lake vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Mirror lake.
- In Tacoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Mirror lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 0.0% in Mirror lake.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Mirror lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.