Demographics details for Minot, ND vs Siloam springs, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Minot, ND vs Siloam springs, AR.

Data Minot Siloam springs
Population 47,759 18,654
Median Age 33.0 years 30.1 years
Median Income $75,545 $59,911
Married Families 39.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 13%
Unemployment Rate 2.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Minot vs Siloam springs

  • In Minot, the population is higher at 47,759, compared to 18,654 in Siloam springs.
  • Residents in Minot have a higher median age of 33.0 years compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Minot has a higher median income of $75,545 compared to $59,911 in Siloam springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Minot at 39.0% compared to 38.0% in Siloam springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Siloam springs at 13%, compared to 10% in Minot.
  • Siloam springs has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.7% in Minot.

Demographics

Demographics Minot vs Siloam springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Minot Siloam springs
Black 4 1
White 78 50
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 7 23
Two or More Races 7 20
American Indian 2 3

Demographics Comparison: Minot vs Siloam springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Minot at 4% compared to 1% in Siloam springs.
  • Minot has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • In Siloam springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Minot.
  • Siloam springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 7% in Minot.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Siloam springs at 20%, compared to 7% in Minot.
  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 2% in Minot.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Minot Siloam springs
Mental Health Not Good 13.3% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 15.0%
Depression 18.8% 26.0%
Smoking 15.9% 21.6%
Binge Drinking 22.5% 14.9%
Obesity 37.8% 39.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Minot vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 13.3% in Minot.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Siloam springs at 26.0% versus 18.8% in Minot.
  • Siloam springs has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 15.9% in Minot.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Minot at 22.5% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 37.8% in Minot.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Siloam springs at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Minot.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Minot Siloam springs
No Schooling 1.3% (614) 3.7% (681)
High School Diploma 16.9% (8,050) 13.5% (2,510)
Less than High School 7.9% (3,779) 17.4% (3,249)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.8% (9,464) 14.4% (2,680)

Education Levels Comparison: Minot vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.3% in Minot.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Minot hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Siloam springs at 17.4%, compared to 7.9% in Minot.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Minot hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.