Demographics details for Milo, MO vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Milo, MO vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Milo | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 61 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 30.6 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $34,375 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Milo vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 61 in Milo.
- The median age in Coalinga is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 30.6 years in Milo.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $34,375 in Milo.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 26.0% in Milo.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 0% in Milo.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 0.0% in Milo.
Demographics
Demographics Milo vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Milo | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 100 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 65 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Milo vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Milo.
- Milo has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Milo.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 0% in Milo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 0% in Milo.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Milo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Milo | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 26.6% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Milo vs Coalinga
- More residents in Milo report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Milo at 27.0% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Milo at 26.6% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Milo at 16.4% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 37.5% in Milo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Milo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Milo | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (13) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (6) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (6) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Milo vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Milo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Milo hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 9.8% in Milo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Milo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.