Demographics details for Middlebury, IN vs Monroe, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Middlebury, IN vs Monroe, MI.
| Data | Middlebury | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,682 | 20,295 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $78,056 | $57,779 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Middlebury vs Monroe
- The population in Monroe is higher at 20,295, compared to 3,682 in Middlebury.
- Residents in Middlebury have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 36.6 years in Monroe.
- Middlebury has a higher median income of $78,056 compared to $57,779 in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Middlebury at 50.0% compared to 33.0% in Monroe.
- The poverty level is higher in Monroe at 12%, compared to 5% in Middlebury.
- Monroe has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.5% in Middlebury.
Demographics
Demographics Middlebury vs Monroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Middlebury | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 6 |
| White | 91 | 86 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Middlebury vs Monroe
- In Monroe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Middlebury.
- Middlebury has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 86% in Monroe.
- The Asian population is larger in Middlebury at 2% compared to 1% in Monroe.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Middlebury and Monroe at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Monroe at 4%, compared to 1% in Middlebury.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Middlebury and Monroe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Middlebury | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Middlebury vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.1% in Middlebury.
- Depression is more prevalent in Middlebury at 27.2% compared to 25.7% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 18.8% in Middlebury.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Monroe at 17.5% compared to 16.1% in Middlebury.
- Monroe has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 34.7% in Middlebury.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Monroe at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Middlebury.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Middlebury | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (25) | 0.5% (105) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (698) | 17.0% (3,449) |
| Less than High School | 14.8% (544) | 13.0% (2,633) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (546) | 13.2% (2,681) |
Education Levels Comparison: Middlebury vs Monroe
- A higher percentage of residents in Middlebury have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middlebury hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Monroe.
- More residents in Middlebury have less than a high school education at 14.8% compared to 13.0% in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Middlebury hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 13.2% in Monroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.