Demographics details for Methuen, MA vs Pleasanton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Methuen, MA vs Pleasanton, CA.
| Data | Methuen | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,241 | 76,689 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $93,681 | $181,639 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Methuen vs Pleasanton
- The population in Pleasanton is higher at 76,689, compared to 53,241 in Methuen.
- The median age in Pleasanton is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 40.6 years in Methuen.
- Pleasanton has a higher median income of $181,639, compared to $93,681 in Methuen.
- In Pleasanton, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 39.0% in Methuen.
- Methuen has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 7% in Pleasanton.
- The unemployment rate in Methuen is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.3% in Pleasanton.
Demographics
Demographics Methuen vs Pleasanton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Methuen | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 51 | 37 |
| Asian | 4 | 42 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Methuen vs Pleasanton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Methuen at 5% compared to 2% in Pleasanton.
- Methuen has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 37% in Pleasanton.
- In Pleasanton, the Asian population stands at 42%, greater than 4% in Methuen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Methuen at 30% compared to 12% in Pleasanton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Methuen at 10% compared to 7% in Pleasanton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Methuen and Pleasanton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Methuen | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 7.3% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 7.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 30.4% | 22.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Methuen vs Pleasanton
- More residents in Methuen report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 13.1% in Pleasanton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Methuen at 23.4% compared to 17.6% in Pleasanton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Methuen at 14.1% compared to 7.2% in Pleasanton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Methuen at 17.7% compared to 17.2% in Pleasanton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Methuen at 30.4% compared to 22.9% in Pleasanton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Methuen at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Pleasanton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Methuen | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (741) | 0.5% (407) |
| High School Diploma | 17.4% (9,266) | 6.2% (4,722) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (7,384) | 3.8% (2,941) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (11,336) | 49.3% (37,825) |
Education Levels Comparison: Methuen vs Pleasanton
- A higher percentage of residents in Methuen have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Pleasanton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Methuen hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 6.2% in Pleasanton.
- More residents in Methuen have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 3.8% in Pleasanton.
- In Pleasanton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 21.3% in Methuen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.