Demographics details for Mesa, AZ vs Flomaton, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mesa, AZ vs Flomaton, AL.
| Data | Mesa | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 512,498 | 1,458 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $73,766 | $37,500 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Mesa vs Flomaton
- In Mesa, the population is higher at 512,498, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- Residents in Mesa have a higher median age of 36.8 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Mesa has a higher median income of $73,766 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mesa at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
- The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 11% in Mesa.
- Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Mesa.
Demographics
Demographics Mesa vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mesa | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 38 |
| White | 52 | 58 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 27 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mesa vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 5% in Mesa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Flomaton at 58% compared to 52% in Mesa.
- The Asian population is larger in Mesa at 2% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mesa at 27% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mesa at 12% compared to 4% in Flomaton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Mesa at 2% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mesa | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 15.3% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 45.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mesa vs Flomaton
- In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.8% in Mesa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Flomaton at 24.6% versus 20.4% in Mesa.
- Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 15.8% in Mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mesa at 17.8% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 31.6% in Mesa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mesa | Flomaton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (6,008) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (70,489) | 25.0% (364) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (60,898) | 19.1% (278) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (102,124) | 9.4% (137) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mesa vs Flomaton
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 13.8% in Mesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 11.9% in Mesa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mesa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.