Demographics details for Medina, WA vs Moorpark, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Medina, WA vs Moorpark, CA.
| Data | Medina | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,857 | 35,514 |
| Median Age | 47.4 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $244,740 | $143,218 |
| Married Families | 55.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Medina vs Moorpark
- The population in Moorpark is higher at 35,514, compared to 2,857 in Medina.
- Residents in Medina have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 38.8 years in Moorpark.
- Medina has a higher median income of $244,740 compared to $143,218 in Moorpark.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Medina at 55.0% compared to 47.0% in Moorpark.
- The poverty level is higher in Moorpark at 8%, compared to 0% in Medina.
- Moorpark has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.8% in Medina.
Demographics
Demographics Medina vs Moorpark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Medina | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 61 | 38 |
| Asian | 28 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Medina vs Moorpark
- In Moorpark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Medina.
- Medina has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 38% in Moorpark.
- The Asian population is larger in Medina at 28% compared to 7% in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 1% in Medina.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moorpark at 17%, compared to 10% in Medina.
- In Moorpark, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Medina.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Medina | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.8% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 6.2% | 9.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 20.8% | 24.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Medina vs Moorpark
- In Moorpark, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.8% compared to 13.3% in Medina.
- Depression is more prevalent in Medina at 23.3% compared to 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher smoking rate at 9.2% compared to 6.2% in Medina.
- Binge drinking is more common in Medina at 18.6% compared to 17.8% in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has higher obesity rates at 24.7% compared to 20.8% in Medina.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Moorpark at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Medina.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Medina | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 0.8% (300) |
| High School Diploma | 1.2% (34) | 9.3% (3,304) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (43) | 11.8% (4,201) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 60.3% (1,723) | 30.1% (10,699) |
Education Levels Comparison: Medina vs Moorpark
- In Moorpark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Medina.
- In Moorpark, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.3% compared to 1.2% in Medina.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Moorpark at 11.8%, compared to 1.5% in Medina.
- A higher percentage of residents in Medina hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 60.3% compared to 30.1% in Moorpark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.