Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Gardner, MA.
| Data | Meadville | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,680 | 20,902 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $46,157 | $56,974 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Gardner
- The population in Gardner is higher at 20,902, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- The median age in Gardner is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Gardner has a higher median income of $56,974, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- In Gardner, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Gardner.
- The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.6% in Gardner.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Meadville | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 86 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Gardner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Meadville at 5% compared to 2% in Gardner.
- Meadville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 82% in Gardner.
- In Gardner, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Meadville.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Meadville at 6% compared to 5% in Gardner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Meadville and Gardner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Meadville | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Gardner
- More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Gardner.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 24.4% in Gardner.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Meadville | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 1.3% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 21.5% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 16.8% (3,513) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 21.5% in Gardner.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardner at 16.8%, compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.