Demographics details for Meadville, PA vs Bozeman, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Meadville, PA vs Bozeman, MT.
| Data | Meadville | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,680 | 56,123 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 28.2 years |
| Median Income | $46,157 | $74,113 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Meadville vs Bozeman
- The population in Bozeman is higher at 56,123, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in Meadville have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher median income of $74,113, compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- In Bozeman, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- Meadville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Bozeman.
- The unemployment rate in Meadville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Meadville vs Bozeman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Meadville | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 86 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Meadville vs Bozeman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Meadville at 5% compared to 1% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Meadville and Bozeman at 86%.
- In Bozeman, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Meadville.
- Bozeman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Meadville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Meadville at 6% compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- In Bozeman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Meadville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Meadville | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 24.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Meadville vs Bozeman
- More residents in Meadville report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Meadville at 26.6% compared to 22.8% in Bozeman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Meadville at 24.2% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Meadville at 41.5% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Meadville | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (29) | 0.0% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (3,110) | 5.7% (3,187) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (1,085) | 2.3% (1,316) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (1,953) | 35.7% (20,038) |
Education Levels Comparison: Meadville vs Bozeman
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Meadville hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- More residents in Meadville have less than a high school education at 8.6% compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- In Bozeman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.