Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Riverbank, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Riverbank, CA.
| Data | Mcpherson | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 24,826 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $89,504 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Riverbank
- The population in Riverbank is higher at 24,826, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- Residents in Mcpherson have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 33.6 years in Riverbank.
- Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504, compared to $69,807 in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcpherson at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Riverbank.
- The poverty level is higher in Riverbank at 10%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Riverbank has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Riverbank provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 87 | 13 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 55 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 23 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Riverbank
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcpherson at 2% compared to 1% in Riverbank.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
- In Riverbank, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Mcpherson.
- Riverbank has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverbank at 23%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- In Riverbank, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Mcpherson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Riverbank
- In Riverbank, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Riverbank at 21.0% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcpherson at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 16.4% in Riverbank.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcpherson at 36.6% compared to 35.0% in Riverbank.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 3.1% (766) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 15.2% (3,764) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 22.2% (5,505) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 11.3% (2,804) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Riverbank
- In Riverbank, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Riverbank, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.2% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverbank at 22.2%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.