Demographics details for Mcpherson, KS vs Pahrump, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcpherson, KS vs Pahrump, NV.
| Data | Mcpherson | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,865 | 44,711 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 53.7 years |
| Median Income | $69,807 | $54,988 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Mcpherson vs Pahrump
- The population in Pahrump is higher at 44,711, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- The median age in Pahrump is higher at 53.7 years, compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807 compared to $54,988 in Pahrump.
- In Pahrump, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
- The poverty level is higher in Pahrump at 10%, compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- Pahrump has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Mcpherson vs Pahrump provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcpherson | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 87 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Pahrump
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Mcpherson and Pahrump at 2%.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
- In Pahrump, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Mcpherson.
- Pahrump has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 6% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pahrump at 10%, compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- In Pahrump, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mcpherson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcpherson | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 23.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcpherson vs Pahrump
- In Pahrump, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pahrump at 24.4% versus 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Pahrump has a higher smoking rate at 23.0% compared to 17.6% in Mcpherson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 15.9% in Pahrump.
- Pahrump has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcpherson | Pahrump |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (48) | 1.1% (507) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (1,775) | 23.0% (10,287) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (804) | 20.5% (9,157) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (3,010) | 10.1% (4,495) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcpherson vs Pahrump
- In Pahrump, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Pahrump, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pahrump at 20.5%, compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcpherson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.