Demographics details for Mcdonough, GA vs Spokane, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcdonough, GA vs Spokane, WA.
| Data | Mcdonough | Spokane |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,340 | 230,160 |
| Median Age | 31.0 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $77,804 | $63,316 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Mcdonough vs Spokane
- The population in Spokane is higher at 230,160, compared to 30,340 in Mcdonough.
- The median age in Spokane is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 31.0 years in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher median income of $77,804 compared to $63,316 in Spokane.
- In Spokane, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mcdonough.
- Mcdonough has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Spokane.
- The unemployment rate in Mcdonough is higher at 5.9%, compared to 4.2% in Spokane.
Demographics
Demographics Mcdonough vs Spokane provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcdonough | Spokane |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 3 |
| White | 14 | 77 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Spokane
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mcdonough at 70% compared to 3% in Spokane.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spokane at 77% compared to 14% in Mcdonough.
- In Spokane, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Mcdonough.
- Spokane has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Mcdonough.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spokane at 9%, compared to 8% in Mcdonough.
- In Spokane, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mcdonough.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcdonough | Spokane |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 16.1% | 15.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcdonough vs Spokane
- In Spokane, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 16.4% in Mcdonough.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spokane at 28.9% versus 19.6% in Mcdonough.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mcdonough at 16.1% compared to 15.9% in Spokane.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spokane at 17.8% compared to 15.1% in Mcdonough.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcdonough at 39.5% compared to 30.4% in Spokane.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spokane at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Mcdonough.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcdonough | Spokane |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (221) | 0.7% (1,705) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (4,501) | 12.2% (28,084) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (1,500) | 8.4% (19,336) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (4,882) | 22.6% (52,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcdonough vs Spokane
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Mcdonough and Spokane at 0.7%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcdonough hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 12.2% in Spokane.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spokane at 8.4%, compared to 4.9% in Mcdonough.
- In Spokane, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.6% compared to 16.1% in Mcdonough.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.