Demographics details for Mc kean, PA vs Raleigh, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc kean, PA vs Raleigh, NC.
| Data | Mc kean | Raleigh |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 478 | 476,587 |
| Median Age | 45.7 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $51,094 | $78,631 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Mc kean vs Raleigh
- The population in Raleigh is higher at 476,587, compared to 478 in Mc kean.
- Residents in Mc kean have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 34.6 years in Raleigh.
- Raleigh has a higher median income of $78,631, compared to $51,094 in Mc kean.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mc kean at 37.0% compared to 33.0% in Raleigh.
- The poverty level is identical in both Mc kean and Raleigh at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Mc kean is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.8% in Raleigh.
Demographics
Demographics Mc kean vs Raleigh provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mc kean | Raleigh |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 27 |
| White | 96 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mc kean vs Raleigh
- In Raleigh, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 27% compared to 1% in Mc kean.
- Mc kean has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 51% in Raleigh.
- In Raleigh, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Mc kean.
- Raleigh has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 0% in Mc kean.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Raleigh at 7%, compared to 3% in Mc kean.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mc kean and Raleigh at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mc kean | Raleigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc kean vs Raleigh
- More residents in Mc kean report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 13.5% in Raleigh.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mc kean at 22.0% compared to 19.3% in Raleigh.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mc kean at 18.4% compared to 12.1% in Raleigh.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mc kean at 19.8% compared to 18.7% in Raleigh.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mc kean at 35.4% compared to 34.2% in Raleigh.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mc kean at 23.0% compared to 9.0% in Raleigh.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mc kean | Raleigh |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.8% (3,854) |
| High School Diploma | 33.7% (161) | 9.0% (42,945) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (26) | 8.1% (38,591) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (78) | 34.9% (166,405) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc kean vs Raleigh
- In Raleigh, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Mc kean.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc kean hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 9.0% in Raleigh.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Raleigh at 8.1%, compared to 5.4% in Mc kean.
- In Raleigh, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 16.3% in Mc kean.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.