Demographics details for Mc intyre, GA vs Costa mesa, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mc intyre, GA vs Costa mesa, CA.

Data Mc intyre Costa mesa
Population 561 109,521
Median Age 39.1 years 36.4 years
Median Income $49,773 $104,981
Married Families 27.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Mc intyre vs Costa mesa

  • The population in Costa mesa is higher at 109,521, compared to 561 in Mc intyre.
  • Residents in Mc intyre have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 36.4 years in Costa mesa.
  • Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981, compared to $49,773 in Mc intyre.
  • In Costa mesa, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 27.0% in Mc intyre.
  • The poverty level is higher in Costa mesa at 9%, compared to 0% in Mc intyre.
  • Costa mesa has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Mc intyre.

Demographics

Demographics Mc intyre vs Costa mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mc intyre Costa mesa
Black 88 1
White -5 40
Asian Data is updating 9
Hispanic 16 37
Two or More Races 1 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mc intyre vs Costa mesa

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mc intyre at 88% compared to 1% in Costa mesa.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Costa mesa at 40% compared to -5% in Mc intyre.
  • In Costa mesa, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Mc intyre.
  • Costa mesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 16% in Mc intyre.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Costa mesa at 12%, compared to 1% in Mc intyre.
  • In Costa mesa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mc intyre.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mc intyre Costa mesa
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% 10.4%
Depression 18.8% 18.5%
Smoking 19.5% 10.9%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 17.1%
Obesity 41.2% 27.6%
Disability Percentage 27.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mc intyre vs Costa mesa

  • More residents in Mc intyre report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Mc intyre at 18.8% compared to 18.5% in Costa mesa.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Mc intyre at 19.5% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Costa mesa at 17.1% compared to 14.1% in Mc intyre.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Mc intyre at 41.2% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Mc intyre at 27.0% compared to 8.0% in Costa mesa.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mc intyre Costa mesa
No Schooling 2.1% (12) 1.8% (2,006)
High School Diploma 28.7% (161) 11.3% (12,406)
Less than High School 24.8% (139) 17.3% (18,969)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.6% (93) 31.2% (34,140)

Education Levels Comparison: Mc intyre vs Costa mesa

  • A higher percentage of residents in Mc intyre have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.8% in Costa mesa.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Mc intyre hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 11.3% in Costa mesa.
  • More residents in Mc intyre have less than a high school education at 24.8% compared to 17.3% in Costa mesa.
  • In Costa mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 16.6% in Mc intyre.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.