Demographics details for Mc clure, OH vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc clure, OH vs Trumann, AR.
| Data | Mc clure | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 693 | 7,305 |
| Median Age | 30.5 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $55,938 | $37,618 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Mc clure vs Trumann
- The population in Trumann is higher at 7,305, compared to 693 in Mc clure.
- The median age in Trumann is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 30.5 years in Mc clure.
- Mc clure has a higher median income of $55,938 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mc clure at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Trumann.
- The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 12% in Mc clure.
- Trumann has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Mc clure.
Demographics
Demographics Mc clure vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mc clure | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 65 | 84 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mc clure vs Trumann
- In Trumann, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Mc clure.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trumann at 84% compared to 65% in Mc clure.
- The Asian population is larger in Mc clure at 4% compared to 0% in Trumann.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mc clure at 16% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mc clure at 15% compared to 8% in Trumann.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mc clure and Trumann at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mc clure | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc clure vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.4% in Mc clure.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 22.4% in Mc clure.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 18.2% in Mc clure.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mc clure at 19.9% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 40.2% in Mc clure.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 22.0% in Mc clure.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mc clure | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 1.8% (135) |
| High School Diploma | 28.6% (198) | 25.9% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (123) | 24.4% (1,780) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.5% (38) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc clure vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Mc clure.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc clure hold a high school diploma at 28.6% compared to 25.9% in Trumann.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 17.7% in Mc clure.
- In Trumann, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.7% compared to 5.5% in Mc clure.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.