Demographics details for Matthews, IN vs Paducah, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Matthews, IN vs Paducah, KY.
Data | Matthews | Paducah |
---|---|---|
Population | 491 | 26,834 |
Median Age | 52.4 years | 42.7 years |
Median Income | $43,281 | $46,984 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Matthews vs Paducah
- The population in Paducah is higher at 26,834, compared to 491 in Matthews.
- Residents in Matthews have a higher median age of 52.4 years compared to 42.7 years in Paducah.
- Paducah has a higher median income of $46,984, compared to $43,281 in Matthews.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Matthews at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Paducah.
- The poverty level is higher in Paducah at 13%, compared to 10% in Matthews.
- Paducah has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.5% in Matthews.
Demographics
Demographics Matthews vs Paducah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Matthews | Paducah |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 22 |
White | 97 | 69 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Matthews vs Paducah
- In Paducah, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 0% in Matthews.
- Matthews has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 69% in Paducah.
- In Paducah, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Matthews.
- Paducah has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Matthews.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Paducah at 5%, compared to 3% in Matthews.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Matthews and Paducah at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Matthews | Paducah |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 20.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 15.0% |
Depression | 27.1% | 27.9% |
Smoking | 18.1% | 24.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 35.8% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Matthews vs Paducah
- In Paducah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.8% in Matthews.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Paducah at 27.9% versus 27.1% in Matthews.
- Paducah has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 18.1% in Matthews.
- Binge drinking is more common in Matthews at 18.4% compared to 13.5% in Paducah.
- Paducah has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 35.8% in Matthews.
- Disability percentages are higher in Matthews at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Paducah.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Matthews | Paducah |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (193) |
High School Diploma | 35.6% (175) | 19.5% (5,222) |
Less than High School | 6.1% (30) | 11.9% (3,195) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.4% (41) | 19.9% (5,334) |
Education Levels Comparison: Matthews vs Paducah
- In Paducah, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Matthews.
- A higher percentage of residents in Matthews hold a high school diploma at 35.6% compared to 19.5% in Paducah.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Paducah at 11.9%, compared to 6.1% in Matthews.
- In Paducah, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 8.4% in Matthews.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.