Demographics details for Matteson, IL vs Lexington, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Matteson, IL vs Lexington, KY.
| Data | Matteson | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,439 | 320,347 |
| Median Age | 43.8 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $88,591 | $66,087 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Matteson vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 320,347, compared to 18,439 in Matteson.
- Residents in Matteson have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 35.2 years in Lexington.
- Matteson has a higher median income of $88,591 compared to $66,087 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Matteson at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 8% in Matteson.
- The unemployment rate in Matteson is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Lexington.
Demographics
Demographics Matteson vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Matteson | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 82 | 15 |
| White | 8 | 68 |
| Asian | 3 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Matteson vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Matteson at 82% compared to 15% in Lexington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lexington at 68% compared to 8% in Matteson.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Matteson.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Matteson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 6%, compared to 5% in Matteson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Matteson and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Matteson | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 14.6% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 13.2% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Matteson vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 13.8% in Matteson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 24.0% versus 14.6% in Matteson.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 13.2% in Matteson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 15.9% compared to 15.8% in Matteson.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 36.0%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Matteson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Matteson | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (116) | 0.6% (2,032) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (2,867) | 9.9% (31,844) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (967) | 8.7% (27,787) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.4% (5,418) | 30.4% (97,540) |
Education Levels Comparison: Matteson vs Lexington
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Matteson and Lexington at 0.6%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Matteson hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 8.7%, compared to 5.2% in Matteson.
- In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 29.4% in Matteson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.