Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Tuscaloosa, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Tuscaloosa, AL.

Data Massapequa park Tuscaloosa
Population 16,873 110,602
Median Age 43.7 years 28.8 years
Median Income $161,193 $47,257
Married Families 52.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 21%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Tuscaloosa

  • The population in Tuscaloosa is higher at 110,602, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 28.8 years in Tuscaloosa.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $47,257 in Tuscaloosa.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 26.0% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tuscaloosa at 21%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Massapequa park and Tuscaloosa at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Massapequa park vs Tuscaloosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Massapequa park Tuscaloosa
Black 1 41
White 88 49
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 5 4
Two or More Races 4 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 49% in Tuscaloosa.
  • In Tuscaloosa, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Massapequa park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Massapequa park at 5% compared to 4% in Tuscaloosa.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Massapequa park at 4% compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Tuscaloosa at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Massapequa park Tuscaloosa
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 19.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 13.6%
Depression 17.9% 21.9%
Smoking 11.5% 19.6%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 14.4%
Obesity 26.4% 44.5%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Tuscaloosa at 21.9% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Tuscaloosa has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 14.4% in Tuscaloosa.
  • Tuscaloosa has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Massapequa park and Tuscaloosa at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Massapequa park Tuscaloosa
No Schooling 0.3% (45) 0.7% (721)
High School Diploma 15.3% (2,586) 12.5% (13,878)
Less than High School 3.8% (641) 6.1% (6,781)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.6% (6,183) 20.3% (22,425)

Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 12.5% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tuscaloosa at 6.1%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 20.3% in Tuscaloosa.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.