Demographics details for Marysville, KS vs Central city, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Marysville, KS vs Central city, KY.

Data Marysville Central city
Population 3,423 5,810
Median Age 38.8 years 33.5 years
Median Income $53,424 $52,184
Married Families 38.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 16%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Marysville vs Central city

  • The population in Central city is higher at 5,810, compared to 3,423 in Marysville.
  • Residents in Marysville have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
  • Marysville has a higher median income of $53,424 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Marysville and Central city at 38.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 0% in Marysville.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Marysville and Central city at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Marysville vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Marysville Central city
Black 2 3
White 86 88
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 2
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Marysville vs Central city

  • In Central city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Marysville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 86% in Marysville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Marysville at 1% compared to 0% in Central city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Marysville at 5% compared to 2% in Central city.
  • Both Marysville and Central city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Marysville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Marysville Central city
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 15.5%
Depression 20.6% 26.8%
Smoking 19.9% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 20.1% 14.8%
Obesity 40.6% 41.9%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Marysville vs Central city

  • In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.7% in Marysville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 20.6% in Marysville.
  • Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 19.9% in Marysville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Marysville at 20.1% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
  • Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 40.6% in Marysville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Marysville at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Marysville Central city
No Schooling 0.2% (8) 1.1% (65)
High School Diploma 20.5% (701) 15.4% (897)
Less than High School 12.0% (410) 15.6% (905)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.7% (674) 8.3% (480)

Education Levels Comparison: Marysville vs Central city

  • In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Marysville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Marysville hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 12.0% in Marysville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Marysville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 8.3% in Central city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.