Demographics details for Marshall, TX vs San rafael, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, TX vs San rafael, CA.
Data | Marshall | San rafael |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,641 | 59,971 |
Median Age | 34.1 years | 44.0 years |
Median Income | $49,162 | $113,839 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs San rafael
- The population in San rafael is higher at 59,971, compared to 23,641 in Marshall.
- The median age in San rafael is higher at 44.0 years, compared to 34.1 years in Marshall.
- San rafael has a higher median income of $113,839, compared to $49,162 in Marshall.
- In San rafael, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 27.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 9% in San rafael.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.6% in San rafael.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs San rafael provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshall | San rafael |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 2 |
White | 28 | 49 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 20 | 33 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs San rafael
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Marshall at 40% compared to 2% in San rafael.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in San rafael at 49% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- In San rafael, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Marshall.
- San rafael has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 20% in Marshall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 11% compared to 9% in San rafael.
- In San rafael, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Marshall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshall | San rafael |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 9.9% |
Depression | 22.7% | 17.5% |
Smoking | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 42.0% | 24.9% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs San rafael
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.5% in San rafael.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 22.7% compared to 17.5% in San rafael.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in San rafael.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San rafael at 16.9% compared to 16.2% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 42.0% compared to 24.9% in San rafael.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in San rafael.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshall | San rafael |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (195) | 2.9% (1,761) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (4,412) | 7.4% (4,459) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (2,527) | 21.6% (12,927) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (3,127) | 36.5% (21,907) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs San rafael
- In San rafael, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.8% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 7.4% in San rafael.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San rafael at 21.6%, compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- In San rafael, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 13.2% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.