Demographics details for Marshall, AR vs Moorpark, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, AR vs Moorpark, CA.
Data | Marshall | Moorpark |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,339 | 35,514 |
Median Age | 52.3 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $28,290 | $143,218 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Moorpark
- The population in Moorpark is higher at 35,514, compared to 1,339 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 52.3 years compared to 38.8 years in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218, compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
- In Moorpark, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 8% in Moorpark.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Moorpark.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Moorpark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshall | Moorpark |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 84 | 38 |
Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
Hispanic | 3 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 17 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Moorpark
- In Moorpark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 38% in Moorpark.
- In Moorpark, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Moorpark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 3% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moorpark at 17%, compared to 12% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Moorpark at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshall | Moorpark |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 8.9% |
Depression | 29.8% | 17.6% |
Smoking | 27.2% | 9.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 39.2% | 24.7% |
Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Moorpark
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 29.8% compared to 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 27.2% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moorpark at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 39.2% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 10.0% in Moorpark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshall | Moorpark |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (12) | 0.8% (300) |
High School Diploma | 27.9% (373) | 9.3% (3,304) |
Less than High School | 32.4% (434) | 11.8% (4,201) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (156) | 30.1% (10,699) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Moorpark
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Moorpark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 11.8% in Moorpark.
- In Moorpark, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 11.7% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.