Demographics details for Marshall, AR vs Fort thomas, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, AR vs Fort thomas, KY.
| Data | Marshall | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,339 | 17,133 |
| Median Age | 52.3 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $28,290 | $95,391 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Fort thomas
- The population in Fort thomas is higher at 17,133, compared to 1,339 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 52.3 years compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391, compared to $28,290 in Marshall.
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 33.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Fort thomas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 84 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Fort thomas
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort thomas at 92% compared to 84% in Marshall.
- In Fort thomas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marshall at 3% compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 12% compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Marshall at 1% compared to 0% in Fort thomas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 29.8% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 27.2% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 30.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Fort thomas
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 29.8% compared to 26.2% in Fort thomas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 27.2% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 39.2% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 30.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (12) | 0.4% (66) |
| High School Diploma | 27.9% (373) | 10.7% (1,840) |
| Less than High School | 32.4% (434) | 3.3% (569) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.7% (156) | 37.3% (6,383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Fort thomas
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 11.7% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.