Demographics details for Marlow, NH vs Spanish fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Marlow, NH vs Spanish fork, UT.

Data Marlow Spanish fork
Population 728 44,102
Median Age 43.0 years 27.4 years
Median Income $65,000 $93,989
Married Families 65.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 10% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.8

Population Comparison: Marlow vs Spanish fork

  • The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 728 in Marlow.
  • Residents in Marlow have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $65,000 in Marlow.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Marlow at 65.0% compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Marlow has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Marlow.

Demographics

Demographics Marlow vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Marlow Spanish fork
Black Data is updating 1
White 95 80
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 12
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Marlow vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Marlow.
  • Marlow has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
  • Both Marlow and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 2% in Marlow.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 3% in Marlow.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marlow and Spanish fork at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Marlow Spanish fork
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.8%
Depression Data is updating% 23.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 7.7%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 8.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 31.0%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Marlow vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlow.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 0.0% in Marlow.
  • Spanish fork has a higher smoking rate at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Marlow.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Spanish fork at 8.3% compared to 0.0% in Marlow.
  • Spanish fork has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlow.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spanish fork at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlow.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Marlow Spanish fork
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (175)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 9.1% (4,010)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.9% (2,583)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.4% (8,546)

Education Levels Comparison: Marlow vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Marlow.
  • In Spanish fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.1% compared to 0.0% in Marlow.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spanish fork at 5.9%, compared to 0.0% in Marlow.
  • In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Marlow.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.