Demographics details for Markle, IN vs Lawrence, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Markle, IN vs Lawrence, KS.
| Data | Markle | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,080 | 95,794 |
| Median Age | 44.5 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,500 | $59,834 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Markle vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 95,794, compared to 1,080 in Markle.
- Residents in Markle have a higher median age of 44.5 years compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $59,834, compared to $59,500 in Markle.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Markle at 44.0% compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is higher in Lawrence at 12%, compared to 8% in Markle.
- The unemployment rate in Markle is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Markle vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Markle | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 94 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Markle vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Markle.
- Markle has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 71% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Markle.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Markle.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 9%, compared to 2% in Markle.
- In Lawrence, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Markle.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Markle | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Markle vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Markle.
- Depression is more prevalent in Markle at 26.3% compared to 22.3% in Lawrence.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Markle at 18.0% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 17.6% in Markle.
- Obesity rates are higher in Markle at 36.7% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Markle at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Markle | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (3) | 0.5% (466) |
| High School Diploma | 38.3% (414) | 8.2% (7,882) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (214) | 4.0% (3,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (155) | 31.1% (29,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Markle vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Markle.
- A higher percentage of residents in Markle hold a high school diploma at 38.3% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Markle have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 14.4% in Markle.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.