Environment details: Manila UT
Good quality, generally safe for use.
Environment details: Picayune MS
Average quality, sufficient for most.
Compare Environment: Manila UT vs Picayune MS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Manila | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 496 | 504 |
| Water Quality | 7/10 | 5/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Good quality, generally safe for use. | Average quality, sufficient for most. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.91 | 1.6 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 41 | 32 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Manila vs Picayune
- Water quality is rated higher in Manila at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in Picayune.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Manila with 1.91 compared to 1.6 in Picayune.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Manila at 41 compared to 32 in Picayune.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.