Demographics details for Manchester, NH vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Manchester, NH vs Lexington, NC.
Data | Manchester | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Population | 115,141 | 19,679 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $74,040 | $36,868 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Manchester vs Lexington
- In Manchester, the population is higher at 115,141, compared to 19,679 in Lexington.
- The median age in Lexington is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 37.0 years in Manchester.
- Manchester has a higher median income of $74,040 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Manchester at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 10% in Manchester.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.6% in Manchester.
Demographics
Demographics Manchester vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Manchester | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 31 |
White | 68 | 38 |
Asian | 5 | 4 |
Hispanic | 12 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Manchester vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 6% in Manchester.
- Manchester has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- The Asian population is larger in Manchester at 5% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 12% in Manchester.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 9% in Manchester.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Manchester and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Manchester | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 15.5% |
Depression | 24.5% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 24.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 35.9% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Manchester vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.4% in Manchester.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 24.5% in Manchester.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 17.3% in Manchester.
- Binge drinking is more common in Manchester at 14.6% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 35.9% in Manchester.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Manchester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Manchester | Lexington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (1,316) | 2.7% (531) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (19,519) | 17.0% (3,355) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (17,348) | 25.6% (5,036) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.1% (26,548) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Manchester vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.1% in Manchester.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 17.0%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 15.1% in Manchester.
- A higher percentage of residents in Manchester hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.