Demographics details for Manchester center, VT vs Paterson, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Manchester center, VT vs Paterson, NJ.

Data Manchester center Paterson
Population 1,835 156,661
Median Age 49.6 years 33.1 years
Median Income $73,333 $52,092
Married Families 30.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 24% 18%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 8.8

Population Comparison: Manchester center vs Paterson

  • The population in Paterson is higher at 156,661, compared to 1,835 in Manchester center.
  • Residents in Manchester center have a higher median age of 49.6 years compared to 33.1 years in Paterson.
  • Manchester center has a higher median income of $73,333 compared to $52,092 in Paterson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Manchester center at 30.0% compared to 27.0% in Paterson.
  • Manchester center has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 18% in Paterson.
  • Paterson has a higher unemployment rate at 8.8% compared to 2.9% in Manchester center.

Demographics

Demographics Manchester center vs Paterson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Manchester center Paterson
Black 1 25
White 97 Data is updating
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic Data is updating 64
Two or More Races 2 17
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Manchester center vs Paterson

  • In Paterson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 1% in Manchester center.
  • Manchester center has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 0% in Paterson.
  • In Paterson, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Manchester center.
  • Paterson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 0% in Manchester center.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Paterson at 17%, compared to 2% in Manchester center.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Manchester center and Paterson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Manchester center Paterson
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.7% 15.1%
Depression 26.6% 16.5%
Smoking 14.8% 17.7%
Binge Drinking 18.6% 13.9%
Obesity 29.6% 38.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Manchester center vs Paterson

  • In Paterson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.4% in Manchester center.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Manchester center at 26.6% compared to 16.5% in Paterson.
  • Paterson has a higher smoking rate at 17.7% compared to 14.8% in Manchester center.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Manchester center at 18.6% compared to 13.9% in Paterson.
  • Paterson has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 29.6% in Manchester center.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Manchester center at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Paterson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Manchester center Paterson
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.1% (3,278)
High School Diploma 22.7% (417) 25.1% (39,354)
Less than High School 9.4% (172) 26.1% (40,961)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.2% (462) 7.9% (12,450)

Education Levels Comparison: Manchester center vs Paterson

  • In Paterson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Manchester center.
  • In Paterson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 22.7% in Manchester center.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Paterson at 26.1%, compared to 9.4% in Manchester center.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Manchester center hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 7.9% in Paterson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.