Demographics details for Lynn haven, FL vs Thornton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lynn haven, FL vs Thornton, CO.
Data | Lynn haven | Thornton |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,044 | 143,282 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $81,378 | $95,064 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Lynn haven vs Thornton
- The population in Thornton is higher at 143,282, compared to 20,044 in Lynn haven.
- Residents in Lynn haven have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 33.7 years in Thornton.
- Thornton has a higher median income of $95,064, compared to $81,378 in Lynn haven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lynn haven at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Thornton.
- The poverty level is higher in Thornton at 9%, compared to 7% in Lynn haven.
- Thornton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.1% in Lynn haven.
Demographics
Demographics Lynn haven vs Thornton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Lynn haven | Thornton |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 2 |
White | 73 | 39 |
Asian | 3 | 6 |
Hispanic | 8 | 37 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Lynn haven vs Thornton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lynn haven at 8% compared to 2% in Thornton.
- Lynn haven has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 39% in Thornton.
- In Thornton, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Lynn haven.
- Thornton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 8% in Lynn haven.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thornton at 15%, compared to 8% in Lynn haven.
- In Thornton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Lynn haven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Lynn haven | Thornton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.9% |
Depression | 21.3% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 21.0% |
Obesity | 28.9% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lynn haven vs Thornton
- More residents in Lynn haven report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Thornton at 22.0% versus 21.3% in Lynn haven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lynn haven at 18.6% compared to 15.1% in Thornton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Thornton at 21.0% compared to 16.9% in Lynn haven.
- Thornton has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 28.9% in Lynn haven.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lynn haven at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Lynn haven | Thornton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (217) | 1.7% (2,448) |
High School Diploma | 11.8% (2,373) | 13.2% (18,983) |
Less than High School | 7.9% (1,576) | 14.7% (20,999) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (3,974) | 19.3% (27,712) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lynn haven vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.1% in Lynn haven.
- In Thornton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.2% compared to 11.8% in Lynn haven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Thornton at 14.7%, compared to 7.9% in Lynn haven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lynn haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 19.3% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.