Demographics details for Lynn haven, FL vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lynn haven, FL vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Lynn haven | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,044 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $81,378 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Lynn haven vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 20,044 in Lynn haven.
- Residents in Lynn haven have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Lynn haven has a higher median income of $81,378 compared to $71,698 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lynn haven at 43.0% compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- Lynn haven has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Lynn haven is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Lynn haven vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lynn haven | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 22 |
| White | 73 | 59 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lynn haven vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 8% in Lynn haven.
- Lynn haven has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Lynn haven at 3% compared to 1% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 8% in Lynn haven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lynn haven at 8% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lynn haven and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lynn haven | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 21.3% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 28.9% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lynn haven vs Clayton
- More residents in Lynn haven report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 21.3% in Lynn haven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Lynn haven at 18.6% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Lynn haven.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 28.9% in Lynn haven.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lynn haven at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lynn haven | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (217) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (2,373) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (1,576) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.8% (3,974) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lynn haven vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Lynn haven have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 11.8% in Lynn haven.
- More residents in Lynn haven have less than a high school education at 7.9% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lynn haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 18.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.