Demographics details for Lynchburg, SC vs Cedar lake, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lynchburg, SC vs Cedar lake, IN.

Data Lynchburg Cedar lake
Population 308 15,592
Median Age 56.2 years 39.5 years
Median Income $21,953 $84,444
Married Families 20.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 18% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Lynchburg vs Cedar lake

  • The population in Cedar lake is higher at 15,592, compared to 308 in Lynchburg.
  • Residents in Lynchburg have a higher median age of 56.2 years compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $21,953 in Lynchburg.
  • In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 20.0% in Lynchburg.
  • Lynchburg has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
  • The unemployment rate in Lynchburg is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.

Demographics

Demographics Lynchburg vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lynchburg Cedar lake
Black 71 Data is updating
White 25 94
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races 3 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lynchburg vs Cedar lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lynchburg at 71% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 25% in Lynchburg.
  • The Asian population is larger in Lynchburg at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Lynchburg.
  • Both Lynchburg and Cedar lake have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lynchburg and Cedar lake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lynchburg Cedar lake
Mental Health Not Good 20.9% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 16.7% 11.1%
Depression 19.2% 25.4%
Smoking 26.1% 18.8%
Binge Drinking 12.4% 19.8%
Obesity 49.3% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 67.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lynchburg vs Cedar lake

  • More residents in Lynchburg report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 19.2% in Lynchburg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lynchburg at 26.1% compared to 18.8% in Cedar lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 12.4% in Lynchburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Lynchburg at 49.3% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Lynchburg at 67.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lynchburg Cedar lake
No Schooling 0.3% (1) 0.4% (67)
High School Diploma 33.4% (103) 21.1% (3,292)
Less than High School 11.4% (35) 7.1% (1,102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.5% (14) 14.1% (2,204)

Education Levels Comparison: Lynchburg vs Cedar lake

  • In Cedar lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Lynchburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lynchburg hold a high school diploma at 33.4% compared to 21.1% in Cedar lake.
  • More residents in Lynchburg have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
  • In Cedar lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 4.5% in Lynchburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.