Demographics details for Lumber bridge, NC vs Healdton, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lumber bridge, NC vs Healdton, OK.

Data Lumber bridge Healdton
Population 82 2,334
Median Age 43.8 years 42.9 years
Median Income $61,250 $45,721
Married Families 38.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.6 4.5

Population Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Healdton

  • The population in Healdton is higher at 2,334, compared to 82 in Lumber bridge.
  • Residents in Lumber bridge have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 42.9 years in Healdton.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher median income of $61,250 compared to $45,721 in Healdton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lumber bridge at 38.0% compared to 31.0% in Healdton.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Healdton.
  • The unemployment rate in Lumber bridge is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.5% in Healdton.

Demographics

Demographics Lumber bridge vs Healdton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lumber bridge Healdton
Black 7 1
White 88 75
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 8
Two or More Races Data is updating 11
American Indian 5 5

Demographics Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Healdton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lumber bridge at 7% compared to 1% in Healdton.
  • Lumber bridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 75% in Healdton.
  • Both Lumber bridge and Healdton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Healdton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Healdton at 11%, compared to 0% in Lumber bridge.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lumber bridge and Healdton at 5%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lumber bridge Healdton
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 20.8%
Physical Health Not Good 14.2% 14.9%
Depression 23.8% 28.2%
Smoking 23.0% 24.9%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 14.6%
Obesity 40.5% 42.2%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Healdton

  • In Healdton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 17.8% in Lumber bridge.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Healdton at 28.2% versus 23.8% in Lumber bridge.
  • Healdton has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 23.0% in Lumber bridge.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lumber bridge at 16.2% compared to 14.6% in Healdton.
  • Healdton has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 40.5% in Lumber bridge.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Healdton at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in Lumber bridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lumber bridge Healdton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.4% (80)
High School Diploma 32.9% (27) 24.2% (565)
Less than High School 9.8% (8) 25.1% (587)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (6) 11.8% (276)

Education Levels Comparison: Lumber bridge vs Healdton

  • In Healdton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.0% in Lumber bridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lumber bridge hold a high school diploma at 32.9% compared to 24.2% in Healdton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Healdton at 25.1%, compared to 9.8% in Lumber bridge.
  • In Healdton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 7.3% in Lumber bridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.