Demographics details for Lufkin, TX vs Bradenton, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lufkin, TX vs Bradenton, FL.
| Data | Lufkin | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,152 | 56,961 |
| Median Age | 33.6 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,938 | $55,795 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Lufkin vs Bradenton
- The population in Bradenton is higher at 56,961, compared to 34,152 in Lufkin.
- The median age in Bradenton is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 33.6 years in Lufkin.
- Lufkin has a higher median income of $57,938 compared to $55,795 in Bradenton.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Lufkin and Bradenton at 34.0%.
- Lufkin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Bradenton.
- The unemployment rate in Lufkin is higher at 4.7%, compared to 3.6% in Bradenton.
Demographics
Demographics Lufkin vs Bradenton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lufkin | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 14 |
| White | 30 | 54 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lufkin vs Bradenton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Lufkin at 18% compared to 14% in Bradenton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bradenton at 54% compared to 30% in Lufkin.
- Both Lufkin and Bradenton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Lufkin at 34% compared to 22% in Bradenton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Lufkin at 15% compared to 8% in Bradenton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Lufkin at 1% compared to 0% in Bradenton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lufkin | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 44.1% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lufkin vs Bradenton
- More residents in Lufkin report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.8% in Bradenton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Lufkin at 25.4% compared to 20.1% in Bradenton.
- Bradenton has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 19.1% in Lufkin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bradenton at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Lufkin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Lufkin at 44.1% compared to 33.2% in Bradenton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Lufkin at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Bradenton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lufkin | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (618) | 0.9% (506) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (4,905) | 19.3% (10,990) |
| Less than High School | 20.2% (6,892) | 15.2% (8,653) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.0% (4,765) | 19.3% (10,990) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lufkin vs Bradenton
- A higher percentage of residents in Lufkin have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.9% in Bradenton.
- In Bradenton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 14.4% in Lufkin.
- More residents in Lufkin have less than a high school education at 20.2% compared to 15.2% in Bradenton.
- In Bradenton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 14.0% in Lufkin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.