Demographics details for Lucernemines, PA vs Tuscaloosa, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Lucernemines, PA vs Tuscaloosa, AL.

Data Lucernemines Tuscaloosa
Population 881 110,602
Median Age 39.3 years 28.8 years
Median Income $67,135 $47,257
Married Families 47.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 10% 21%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Lucernemines vs Tuscaloosa

  • The population in Tuscaloosa is higher at 110,602, compared to 881 in Lucernemines.
  • Residents in Lucernemines have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 28.8 years in Tuscaloosa.
  • Lucernemines has a higher median income of $67,135 compared to $47,257 in Tuscaloosa.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Lucernemines at 47.0% compared to 26.0% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tuscaloosa at 21%, compared to 10% in Lucernemines.
  • The unemployment rate in Lucernemines is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Tuscaloosa.

Demographics

Demographics Lucernemines vs Tuscaloosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Lucernemines Tuscaloosa
Black Data is updating 41
White 99 49
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races 1 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Lucernemines has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 49% in Tuscaloosa.
  • In Tuscaloosa, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Lucernemines.
  • Tuscaloosa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tuscaloosa at 3%, compared to 1% in Lucernemines.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lucernemines and Tuscaloosa at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Lucernemines Tuscaloosa
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 19.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 13.6%
Depression 23.9% 21.9%
Smoking 20.4% 19.6%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 14.4%
Obesity 39.2% 44.5%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Lucernemines vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.6% in Lucernemines.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Lucernemines at 23.9% compared to 21.9% in Tuscaloosa.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Lucernemines at 20.4% compared to 19.6% in Tuscaloosa.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Lucernemines at 18.9% compared to 14.4% in Tuscaloosa.
  • Tuscaloosa has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 39.2% in Lucernemines.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tuscaloosa at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Lucernemines.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Lucernemines Tuscaloosa
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.7% (721)
High School Diploma 20.9% (184) 12.5% (13,878)
Less than High School 0.2% (2) 6.1% (6,781)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.6% (76) 20.3% (22,425)

Education Levels Comparison: Lucernemines vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Lucernemines.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Lucernemines hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 12.5% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tuscaloosa at 6.1%, compared to 0.2% in Lucernemines.
  • In Tuscaloosa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 8.6% in Lucernemines.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.