Demographics details for Lowry, MN vs Tullahoma, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Lowry, MN vs Tullahoma, TN.
| Data | Lowry | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 336 | 20,830 |
| Median Age | 42.9 years | 40.2 years |
| Median Income | $76,250 | $56,771 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Lowry vs Tullahoma
- The population in Tullahoma is higher at 20,830, compared to 336 in Lowry.
- Residents in Lowry have a higher median age of 42.9 years compared to 40.2 years in Tullahoma.
- Lowry has a higher median income of $76,250 compared to $56,771 in Tullahoma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Lowry at 46.0% compared to 41.0% in Tullahoma.
- The poverty level is higher in Tullahoma at 10%, compared to 5% in Lowry.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Lowry and Tullahoma at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Lowry vs Tullahoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Lowry | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 94 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Lowry vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Lowry.
- Lowry has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 83% in Tullahoma.
- In Tullahoma, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Lowry.
- Tullahoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Lowry.
- Both Lowry and Tullahoma have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Lowry and Tullahoma at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Lowry | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Lowry vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 15.5% in Lowry.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tullahoma at 28.9% versus 24.2% in Lowry.
- Tullahoma has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 18.8% in Lowry.
- Binge drinking is more common in Lowry at 20.7% compared to 15.1% in Tullahoma.
- Tullahoma has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 34.9% in Lowry.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tullahoma at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Lowry.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Lowry | Tullahoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (64) | 18.9% (3,932) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (19) | 14.1% (2,944) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.6% (39) | 19.3% (4,012) |
Education Levels Comparison: Lowry vs Tullahoma
- In Tullahoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Lowry.
- A higher percentage of residents in Lowry hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 18.9% in Tullahoma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tullahoma at 14.1%, compared to 5.7% in Lowry.
- In Tullahoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 11.6% in Lowry.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.