Demographics details for Los gatos, CA vs Bethlehem, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Los gatos, CA vs Bethlehem, PA.
Data | Los gatos | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
Population | 32,402 | 77,617 |
Median Age | 45.6 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $198,117 | $62,072 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Los gatos vs Bethlehem
- The population in Bethlehem is higher at 77,617, compared to 32,402 in Los gatos.
- Residents in Los gatos have a higher median age of 45.6 years compared to 35.9 years in Bethlehem.
- Los gatos has a higher median income of $198,117 compared to $62,072 in Bethlehem.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Los gatos at 52.0% compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
- The poverty level is higher in Bethlehem at 13%, compared to 4% in Los gatos.
- The unemployment rate in Los gatos is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Bethlehem.
Demographics
Demographics Los gatos vs Bethlehem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Los gatos | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 9 |
White | 66 | 47 |
Asian | 18 | 3 |
Hispanic | 8 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Los gatos vs Bethlehem
- In Bethlehem, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Los gatos.
- Los gatos has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 47% in Bethlehem.
- The Asian population is larger in Los gatos at 18% compared to 3% in Bethlehem.
- Bethlehem has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 8% in Los gatos.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bethlehem at 11%, compared to 7% in Los gatos.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Los gatos and Bethlehem at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Los gatos | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.4% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 6.8% | 12.1% |
Depression | 17.1% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 6.3% | 18.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 19.5% | 34.7% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Los gatos vs Bethlehem
- In Bethlehem, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.4% in Los gatos.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bethlehem at 21.8% versus 17.1% in Los gatos.
- Bethlehem has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 6.3% in Los gatos.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bethlehem at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Los gatos.
- Bethlehem has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 19.5% in Los gatos.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bethlehem at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Los gatos.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Los gatos | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (79) | 0.6% (452) |
High School Diploma | 3.8% (1,237) | 16.9% (13,125) |
Less than High School | 3.2% (1,039) | 12.9% (10,045) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.9% (17,788) | 22.0% (17,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Los gatos vs Bethlehem
- In Bethlehem, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Los gatos.
- In Bethlehem, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 3.8% in Los gatos.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bethlehem at 12.9%, compared to 3.2% in Los gatos.
- A higher percentage of residents in Los gatos hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.9% compared to 22.0% in Bethlehem.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.