Demographics details for London, KY vs Carthage, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in London, KY vs Carthage, MO.
| Data | London | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,578 | 15,491 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 31.6 years |
| Median Income | $45,858 | $43,526 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: London vs Carthage
- The population in Carthage is higher at 15,491, compared to 7,578 in London.
- Residents in London have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 31.6 years in Carthage.
- London has a higher median income of $45,858 compared to $43,526 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in London at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 14%, compared to 13% in London.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.8% in London.
Demographics
Demographics London vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | London | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 93 | 52 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: London vs Carthage
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both London and Carthage at 2%.
- London has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 52% in Carthage.
- Both London and Carthage have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 2% in London.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carthage at 10%, compared to 2% in London.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in London.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | London | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 29.0% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 24.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 46.7% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: London vs Carthage
- More residents in London report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 20.2% in Carthage.
- Depression is more prevalent in London at 29.0% compared to 26.7% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 24.5% in London.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carthage at 15.0% compared to 14.8% in London.
- Obesity rates are higher in London at 46.7% compared to 42.7% in Carthage.
- Disability percentages are higher in London at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Carthage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | London | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (93) | 3.7% (576) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (1,496) | 13.1% (2,032) |
| Less than High School | 18.6% (1,409) | 30.4% (4,717) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (900) | 12.9% (2,006) |
Education Levels Comparison: London vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.2% in London.
- A higher percentage of residents in London hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 13.1% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 30.4%, compared to 18.6% in London.
- In Carthage, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 11.9% in London.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.